jblewis
-
Content count
1,990 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
95
About jblewis
-
Rank
Clubhouse
- Birthday 09/15/1988
Recent Profile Visitors
1,524 profile views
-
CCLP1 (MS) #127 (In the Pink): 421 (+1, bc) tyklftr 6,005,970 (b)
-
CCLP4 (MS) #91 (How to Retune Your Harp): 406 (+2, b+2) 6,109,500 (b) CCLP4 (Lynx) #39 (In the Walls of Gravel Castle): 438 (+4, b+4) #48 (Key Insight): 292 (+1, b+1) #84 (Forsythia): 396 (+5, b+5) #91 (How to Retune Your Harp): 370 (+6, b+6) 6,100,030
-
CCLP4 (MS) #9 (Pinball): 247 (+1, b+1) 6,109.480 (b)
-
CCLP4 (Lynx) #9 (Pinball): 242 (+1, bc) 6,099,870
-
CCLP4 (Lynx) #9 (Pinball): 241 (+1, b+1) 6,099,860
-
You are more than welcome to LP this set as well. Don’t let me discourage you.
-
Facing the Future: What's Next for Official Sets?
jblewis replied to jblewis's topic in Chip's Challenge 2
I like the idea - though I'd personally prefer to see a single set with the best of the four CCLPs (perhaps with 200 levels?) then all four sets. -
Facing the Future: What's Next for Official Sets?
jblewis replied to jblewis's topic in Chip's Challenge 2
I'm inclined to lean toward CC2 on the basis of potential. While it's worth discussing, I don't think it's going to do a lot of good at this point to debate how many "eligible" levels are available for a community pack for either game right now. I can remember back in the late '90s, we barely had any custom levels but proceeded to create CCLP2 anyway around 2000-2001. The pack turned out quite well and inspired so many budding designers to create levels of their own that CCLP3's voting pool dwarfed CCLP2's by quite a few magnitudes. That's what community packs are great for - exploring new ideas and design styles just enough that someone who may have been skittish about their own creativity takes that first step. Right now, CC2 doesn't have a set like that. The original game was created back in the late '90s, and the editor was limited enough that most of the levels were built with the 10x10 map size. Some of the elements were barely used in the stock game's main campaign, which is a shame. I'd wait a year or two to begin working toward voting for a set, but just from playing some of the levels that have been made, the quality far exceeds what was available for CC1 when CCLP2 was assembled. For anyone who's hesitant to let go of the familiarity of CC1, I'd recommend playing through a set like Joshua Bone's Walls of CC1 and see just how much potential there is to be uncovered in CC2. The sky's the limit if we're willing to invest in it. -
CCLP4 (Lynx) #50 (Secret Underground Society): 336 (+1, b+1) 6,099,850
-
CCLP4 (Lynx) #65 (Duplex): 620 (+5, b+5) #117 (Greenian Motion): 269 (+1, b+1) #128 (Mindless Self-Indulgence): 505 (+10, b+10) 6,099,840
-
CCLP4 (Lynx) #62 (Block Unpuzzle): 358 (+1) #65 (Duplex): 615 (b+6) #100 (One Tank’s Adventure): 898 (b+25) #121 (Death and Destruction): 425 (b+4) #123 (Life Is Not a Puzzle): 656 (b+2) 6,099,680
-
CCLP4 (Lynx) #38 (Detonation Station): 189 (b+3) #146 (Japanese Game Show): [839] (b+14)
-
CC1 (Lynx) #63 (BLOCK FACTORY): 473 (+2, b) 5,897,950 (b) CCLP4 (Lynx) #43 (Coral Reef): 422 (b+4)
-
CCLP4 (MS) #143 (Color Coordination): 648 (+3, bc) 6,109,470 (b) CCLP4 (Lynx) #143 (Color Coordination): 643 (+3, b+3)
-
CC2 #104 (PIECES OF EIGHT): 289 (+1, bc) | 54890 (+10, bc) #114 (IN THE LONG RUN): 79 (+1, bc) | 58790 (+10, bc) #163 (BLOX): 328 (+1, bc) | 84780 (+10, bc) #188 (CLONE): 320 (+3, bc) | 97200 (+30, bc) Total seconds: 37,618 (b) Total score: 14,535,891 (b)
- 95 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- j.b. lewis
- jblewis
- (and 8 more)
